Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Drycleaners & Launderers Ass'n v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Industrial Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1987No. Appeal, No. 278 C.D. 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

This is an appeal by the Pennsylvania Dry Cleaners and Launderers Association and Dale I. Kaplan Inc., t/a Capen Careful Cleaners (petitioners) from an order of the Industrial Board (Board) which, inter alia, declared that Sections 5(b) and 8(d) of the Dry Cleaning and *362Dyeing Law, Act of May 14, 1949, P. L. 1342, as amended, 35 P.S. §§1269.5(b), 1269.8(d) (Law) were unreasonable as applied to One Hour Martinizing dry cleaning (Martinizing) and its franchisee, Mr. Tae Ho Cho (Mr. Cho).

The Board made the following relevant findings. Martinizing is located in a one-story…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., Zinc Smelting DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Builders Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API