Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Thomas Emery's Sons

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1890No. 2871PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Harris. Tried below before Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Defendants in error having recovered two judgments against plaintiff in error, a municipal corporation, brought this action to compel the city, through its officers, to satisfy them.

These judgments were alleged to have been obtained on coupons for interest on bonds issued by the city. The petition, after setting out the *284rendition of the judgments and showing as an exhibit the authority under which the bonds were issued, alleges that the judgments are still unsatisfied, and that by the terms of its charter the property of the defendants is not subject to execution.

Plainti…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denison v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Mann v. FalconTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Hogan v. KellumTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Edgar v. Galveston City Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Thorne v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Jordan v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. White v. Texas Motor Car & Supply Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Matagorda County Drainage Dist. No. 1 v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API