Legal Opinion

Mertens v. Abbott Laboratories

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 27, 1983No. Nos. D.N.H. C-80-223, D.R.I. 80-0478-BPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FRANCIS J. BOYLE, Chief Judge, Sitting by Designation.

This action was brought by twelve Plaintiffs. Eight of them are women who allege that by reason of exposure to diethylstilbestrol (hereinafter referred to as DES) in útero, they suffered various injuries, including cancerous or pre-cancerous conditions, repeated pregnancy losses, infertility, incomplete, defective or abnormal development of their reproductive tracts and other adverse effects. They seek damages and a variety of other forms of relief, including the establishment of a fund and treatment facilities for themselves and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berman v. Narragansett Racing Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Payton v. Abbott LabsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
  3. Yandle v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
  4. Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  5. Ford v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API