Peden v. Blackmon
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to *50demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Matthews v. St. Petersburg Auto Auction, Inc. (Fla.App.1966) 190 So.2d 215; Cloud v. Fallis (Fla.1959) 110 So.2d 669; Lowenthal v. Laurent (Fla.App.1958) 102 So.2d 410; Hart v. Held (1941) 149 Fla. 33, 5 So.2d 878; Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring, 146 Fla. 154, 200 So. 376.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Radiant Oil Co. v. HerringSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Hart, Et Vir v. HeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Lowenthal v. LaurentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Matthews v. St. Petersburg Auto Auction, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966