Legal Opinion

King v. Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1906No. Appeal, No. 18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 18, April T., 1906, by-defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co.,. May T., 1906, No. 478, sustaining demurrer to return of writ of alternative mandamus in case of Charlotte S. King y. James Brown. Petition for mandamus. Demurrer to return.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 18, April T., 1906, by-defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co.,. May T., 1906, No. 478, sustaining demurrer to return of writ of alternative mandamus in case of Charlotte S. King y. James Brown. Petition for mandamus. Demurrer to return. From the record it appears that plaintiff was awarded damages for the grading and paving of a street by a jury of view, and that the award was confirmed by the court on May 28,1904. On January 17, 1905, demand was made on defendant’s city controller for a warrant for the amount of the award and interest thereon. On the controller…

1Opinion of the Court

Per. Curiam,

In Pennsylvania interest is a legal incident to a judgment for money: Commonwealth v. Vanderslice, 8 S. & R. 452; Shaller v. Brand, 6 Binney, 435 ; Wither’s Appeal, 16 Pa. 151; Act of 1700, 1 Sm. L. 7. This is the general rule, and it has not been shown to us that a judgment against a municipal corporation is an exception to it, or that proof that the corporation has provided the funds to pay it will prevent the running of interest until demand be made.

The case of Friend v. Pittsburg, 131 Pa. 305, upon which the appellant’s counsel relies, does not deal with that precise question,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Township of North Whitehall v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. In re Sedgeley AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. City of Philadelphia v. DyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  4. Wither's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  5. City of Philadelphia v. MiskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opening of ParkwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Runyan v. McConnellsburg Borough School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API