Holly v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

PER CURIAM: *

Genana Holly, a Texas resident, filed this employment-discrimination action pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP). She appeals the district court’s order granting the defendant’s amended motion to dismiss, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5), for insufficiency of service of process. In that motion, Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro) contended that Holly’s service of process was insufficient under Fed. R.CrvP. 4(j)(2) because she had directed the United States Marshal’s Service to send the summons and complaint to a Metro attorney, Deborah Richard, who allegedly has not been…