Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Brookridge Farm, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1940No. 1982Published

1Dissent

HUXMAN, Circuit .Judge

(dissenting in part).

I concur in the opinion of Judge BRATTON upholding the validity of the first contract executed between the government and Brookridge Farm, Inc., a corporation, herein called Brookridge, but dissent from that part of the opinion denying Brookridge damages for the breach of the first contract for the period of time covered by the second contract.

When the government breached its contract for the purchase of this milk, it became the duty of Brookridge to mitigate its damages by disposing of the milk on the most favorable terms obtainable. It was its duty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warren v. StoddartSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Lawrence v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  3. Arkansas & Texas Grain Co. v. Young & Fresch Grain Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. McKay v. FlemingColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API