Legal Opinion

Fay v. Sanderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1882Published

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Tbe plaintiff in tbis case recovered judgment on evidence tending to establish tbe following state ■of facts:

In September, 1878, one Beimer owned certain real estate in the city of Detroit, which was encumbered by a mortgage to Catharine Fay, the plaintiff’s wife, for $600, on which interest had accrued to the ainount of $126. Sander-son and Johnston were then in business together as dealers in real estate, and they or one of them owned a parcel of real estate in Nankin. Between them and Beimer an ■exchange was made, by the terms of which it was agreed that Beimer should pay $400 on Catharine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Catlin v. BirchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Halsted v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API