Legal Opinion

People v. Dunnigan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 2000No. 5 — 99 — 0242, 5 — 99 — 0277 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

Each of the defendants involved in these two cases was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. Each filed a motion to exclude or suppress the results of his or her breathalyzer exam, based on People v. Morris, 301 Ill. App. 3d 603, 703 N.E.2d 923 (1998), alleging that the instrument used to test their breath, the Intoxilyzer 5000, was not operated in conformity with the Illinois Administrative Code. In each instance, the defendant’s motion was granted. The State appeals, contending the trial court erred in excluding and suppressing the test results. We agree and therefore reverse.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. OrthIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. People v. CadyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LarsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. People v. LarsenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API