Legal Opinion
City of Douglas v. Cartrett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 6, 1964No. 40682PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
The city excepts to the overruling of its general demurrer; thus, if for any reason the petition does not set out a cause of action it must prevail.
The grant of the easement by Mrs. Cartrett to the city was by a deed poll dated July 0, 1952. In addition to the grant of the easement for the running of an effluent line from a sewage disposal plant across her lands, the instrument included the following agreements, which she avers have been breached resulting in damage to her property, for which the city has made no payment:
“ [F]urther the party of the second part is to have the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Love v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Delta Air Corporation v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Horkan v. City of MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- City Council of Augusta v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Ledbetter Bros. v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- City of Powder Springs v. WMM Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Foster v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- CSX Transportation, Inc., National Raliroad Passenger Corp. v. The City of Garden City, Arco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.