Legal Opinion

HBI, Inc. v. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. (In re Mackey)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1999No. BAP No. CC-98-1852; Bankruptcy No. LA-97-42201-SB; Adversary No. LA-98-99907-SBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The question is whether the appellees timely filed their statement of election to have this appeal heard by the district court. If the statement of election was not timely filed, then it remains with the bankruptcy appellate panel (“BAP”). We conclude that it was timely filed, but only because of the 3-day extension mandated by rale when service of notice is by mail.

This is our third installment in assessing the nuances of Judicial Code § 158(c)(1), which provides that parties may “elect” to have an appeal heard by the district court instead of the BAP. 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ioane v. Collins (In Re Ioane)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Arkansas Teachers Retirement System v. Official Investment Pool Participants Committee (In re County of Orange)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. DeWoskin v. Hibbits (In Re Sullivan Jewelry, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re MacKeyUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. In re SnellBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API