Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tiara Condominium Ass'n v. Marsh & McLennan Companies

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 7, 2013No. SC10-1022Published

1DissentPolston, C.J.

The Eleventh Circuit certified the following question:

Does an insurance broker provide a “professional service” such that the insurance broker is unable to successfully assert the economic loss rule as a bar to tort claims seeking economic damages that arise from the contractual relationship between the insurance broker and the insured?

No. This Court’s controlling precedent clearly answers the certified question in the negative. But without justification, the majority greatly expands the use of tort law at a cost to Florida’s contract law. Now, there are tort claims and remedies available to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Indemnity Ins. Co. v. American AviationSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Hotels of Key Largo, Inc. v. RHI HOTELSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Garden v. FrierSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Straub Capital Corp. v. L. Frank ChopinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API