Tallmadge v. East River Bank
The Superior Court of New York City
This was a motion, on the part of the defendants, to dissolve an injunction restraining them from proceeding to build on a certain part of a lot belonging to them, on the corner of the 3rd Avenue and St. Mark’s Place. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the judge.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
An injunction order Was granted on the com» plaint of the plaintiffs, alleging that the East River Bank had purchased certain premises on the north-east corner of 3d Avenue and St. Mark’s Place, in this city, and were about tearing down the present building for the purpose of erecting a banking house, which should extend to the northerly line of Eighth street, or St. Mark’s Place, as originally laid out on the commissioners’ map, and that such building when erected would project or extend eight feet beyond the houses of the plaintiffs and others, owners of property on Eighth street, or St.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Clark v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Bradley v. WalkerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
- Bradley v. WalkerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892
- Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchThe Superior Court of New York City · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.