Capotosto v. City of New York

—In two related actions pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e which were joined for trial, the plaintiffs in Action No. 1 appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated June 26, 2000, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant City of New York which was to dismiss the complaint in Action No. 1 insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action and denied tfyeir cross motion for summary judgment, and Robert K. Noblin, a defendant in Action No. 1 and the plaintiff in Action No. 2, separately…