Legal Opinion

Vang v. Saul

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 26, 2019No. 0:18-cv-01734Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Chao V., Case No. 18-cv-1734 (HB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. HILDY BOWBEER, United States Magistrate Judge Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff Chao V. seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Acting Commissioner of Social Security denying his applications for supplemental security income (“SSI”) and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). The matter is now before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kirby v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Bertha Eichelberger v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. Allen R. Prosch v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Buckner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API