Legal Opinion

People v. Flynn

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from orders denying a motion in arrest of judgment, denying a motion for a new trial, and from a judgment of the district court of the third district. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

MisteR, J.:

The defendant in this ease was indicted in the third district court, October 4, 1890, charged with the crime of grand larceny in stealing a horse of the value of $50. Several errors are assigned as having occurred at the trial, but, as there is no testimony embraced in the abstract or record, we cannot review them here.

The abstract in- this case is so imperfect that it is difficult for the court to consider any of the questions presented, especially as there were no sufficient exceptions taken to the charge of the court as would ordinarily justify the court in making any…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Mahon v. JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Frankel v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Rigor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. In Re SchechtelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  5. State v. CouchUtah Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API