Legal Opinion

State v. Espeland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 7, 1975No. 1397-3PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

Petitioner seeks a dismissal because of a failure to comply with CrR 3.3.1 We grant the dismissal.

*850Because this case is determined by the provisions of Crft 3.3, we chronologically set forth the pertinent dates:

September 14, 1974 — Petitioner was arrested after issuance of a warrant and released upon posting bail.

September 16,1974 — Petitioner was arraigned in superior court and entered a plea of not guilty. At that time, the following transpired:

The Court: . . .We will set an Omnibus Hearing for October 7th. Do you wish to have a trial date set now or at that time?

Mr. Boardman: I prefer to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. BloomstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. State v. NiblackWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. JackWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. State v. DeLongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API