Legal Opinion
State v. Klem
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1989No. Cr. 880148PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Ernest Klem (Klem) appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts1 of gross sexual imposition in violation of § 12.1-20-03, N.D.C.C., from the judgment of conviction, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
The victim of the offenses was Klem’s adopted son. A general recitation of facts is unnecessary. Of several issues Klem has raised on appeal, we need consider only one:
“DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR WHEN IT EXCLUDED THE PUBLIC FROM THE COURTROOM DURING THE TESTIMONY OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM OF A SEXUAL CRIME WITHOUT…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kathleen A. Braun v. Barbara PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Gilbert Nieto v. George SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- State v. EnnisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MoralesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. ClemonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.