Legal Opinion

United States v. Holt State Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1923No. 6223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit in equity by the United States against the homesteaders and their successors in interest, the riparian owners of' the lands on the shores of Mud Take in Minnesota, to quiet its title to the bed of that lake and to perpetually enjoin the defendants from making any farther claim thereto.

There was in the western part of Minnesota in 1889 in townships 156, north of range 42, and 156, north of range 41, west of the Fifth Principal Meridian, a body of water called Mud Lake, which covered an area of about 4,929 acres. The Chippewa Indians were occupy*163ing that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Shore v. Shell Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1931
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API