Legal Opinion
Noble Co. v. C. S. Johnson Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided February 28, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Noble Co., a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Noble”, filed this action against the C. S. Johnson Company, an Illinois Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Johnson”, to obtain a declaratory judgment pursuant to Section 2201, Title 28 U.S.C.A. Noble alleged that a controversy had arisen on the validity and infringement of Johnson patents No. 2,199,289 hereinafter referred to as 2199, and No. 2,109,534 hereinafter referred to as 2109. Johnson filed a counterclaim alleging the ownership of the patents by virtue of an assignment from C.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Concrete Appliances Co. v. GomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewis E. Hamel Co. v. P & K, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1960
- Langsett v. Marmet CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
- Olsen v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960