Jordan v. Muth

The only questions presented by this appeal arise on the ruling of the court on appellant’s motion for a now trial; and the only questions argued by counsel for appellant, arising upon this motion and ruling, relate to the-sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the-court.

*656It is contended, by counsel for appellant, that “ the evidence in the case consists solely of the agreed statement of facts, together with the correspondence between the appellant, doing business' in Indianapolis, and the appellees, doing business in Pittsburgh; ” while counsel for the appellees contend that…