Peterson v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant was convicted of two traffic offenses, namely, “colliding” 1 and “leaving after colliding.” 2 He asserts that the evidence was not sufficient to support either conviction.
The evidence was that at about two hours after midnight an automobile owned by one Margaret Middleton collided with an automobile parked in front of its owner’s home; that the only occupant of the striking vehicle was the driver, a man, and immediately after the collision he abandoned the automobile and ran away. Two neighbors of the owner of the parked vehicle heard the noise of the collision…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Tuchman v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977