Legal Opinion

U S Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Guenther

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1929No. 5107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

Passing, the contention that the ordinance does not “fix an .age limit” for the operation of an automobile, per se, the sole remaining question for determination is one of construction, whether this phrase of the policy was intended to preclude liability where the age limit is fixed by municipal ordinance and no limit is fixed by state statute. Manifestly the provision is “to be construed according to the sense and meaning of the terms which the parties have used, and if they_ are clear and unambiguous.. their terms are to be taken and understood in their p.lain,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Rosenberg v. City of SelmaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Iron Mountain R. Co. of Memphis v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirkby v. Federal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  2. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  3. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API