Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Pearson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 3, 2012No. AC 32535Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Margaret Pearson, appeals from the trial court’s refusal to consider her motion to open the judgment dissolving her marriage to the defendant, Gary Pearson. The plaintiff claims that the court failed to meet its obligation to decide every matter properly before it, and that, by doing so, the court deprived her of her right to appeal the judgment of dissolution by causing the twenty day appeal period to expire without considering her motion. Because we decide that the appeal is moot, we dismiss the appeal.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Commissioner of Correction v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. DeCarlo v. KolnaskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API