Legal Opinion

Reinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 16, 1936Published

1Per curiam

For a full statement .of the facts from which this litigation arises see: Rheinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 112 Fla. 267, 150 So. 266, and Rheinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 118 Fla. 237, 160 So. 69. Other questions were also settled in these cases, but it is not necessary to restate them here.

The action was originally brought to recover an undercharge for freight on “stave bolts and heading” from which barrels are manufactured. Defendant in error contends that the plaintiff in error paid only a portion of the freight charges legally due on the tariffs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Reinschmidt v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API