Legal Opinion

Geboski v. Montana Armory Board

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1940No. 9,004PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

The plaintiff, a taxpayer of the city of Helena, brings this original proceeding in this court seeking to restrain the defendant Armory Board and its members from performing certain acts regarding the erection of armories in the cities of Helena and Bozeman.

Under Chapter 161 of the Laws of 1939 the Montana Armory Board was created, particularly naming its status to be “ a body politic and corporate.” Section 2. The board was given certain powers. The powers particularly applicable to this case are as follows:

‘ ‘ Section 4. The Montana armory board shall possess all the powers as a body…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Veeder v. State Board of EducationMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Hawkins v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Petition of Board of Public BuildingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Clayton v. KervickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. State Office Bldg. Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State ex rel. Fatzer v. Kansas Armory BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Huber v. GroffMontana Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API