Williams v. Keyser
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from tile Circuit Court of Santa Rosa county. This case was decided at Tallahassee. A statement of the case is contained in the opinion of the Court. Under the first assignment of error, we remark that the instrument called for being in custody of the agent of Key-ser, notice to the agent to produce it was sufficient.
Read the full summary
Appeal from tile Circuit Court of Santa Rosa county. This case was decided at Tallahassee. A statement of the case is contained in the opinion of the Court. Under the first assignment of error, we remark that the instrument called for being in custody of the agent of Key-ser, notice to the agent to produce it was sufficient. Benton vs. Payne, 2 Car. & Payne, 520; St. Clair vs. Stevenson, 1 Car. & Payne, 582. The instrument called for was regularly executed, received by .Keyser, kept evidently with great care and contained the clearest admission that the defendant Keyser was a member of the…
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This suit was brought in the Circuit Court of Santa Kosa county by Zaehariah Williams against Sam’l C. Keyser, as surviving partner of the mercantile firm of Alexander Mc-Toy & Co., which firm was composed, it is alleged, of Alexander Me Voy. Roman Mir and Samuel C. Keyser. The object of the suit is to recover the sum of $2,500, which the plaintiff alleges is due him oil a note executed by Alexander Me Voy & Go. to Samuel Stewart, and by Stewart endorsed to the plaintiff.
The defendant Keyser pleads, 1st, that at the time of the making of the promissory note he was not one of the members of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Thalheim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Sylvester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Morey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Meachem v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.