Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 2015No. 15-717Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARC T. AMY, Judge.

| ¶ Upon the lodging of the record in this case, this court issued a rule for the appellant, the State of Louisiana, to show cause by brief only why the appeal should not be dismissed as having been taken from a non-appealable, interlocutory order. The State filed a brief in response to this court’s rule. For the reasons below, we dismiss the appeal and permit the State thirty days to file an application for supervisory review with this court.

The appellee, David Pittman, was convicted pursuant to La.R.S. 40:966 for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. However,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burge v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. State v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. State v. KaercherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  5. State v. PittmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API