Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 8, 1969No. 2 CA-CR 147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

The important question in this case concerns the admissibility of a written confession elicited from and signed by appellant while he was recovering from a bout of intoxication, and after he had received, at his request, a quantity of liquor from an interrogating officer.

The appellant, Robert Morgan Thompson, and one Kunlcle were jointly charged with and tried for the crimes of burglary and grand theft in connection with the entry into and looting of Pearl’s Bar, an establishment located on the Miracle Mile in the City of Tucson. The evidence showed that the bar was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. People v. SchompertNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. In re CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. GortarezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API