Legal Opinion
State v. Coyne
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 9, 2000No. 17205-8-III, 17206-6-IIIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
995 P.2d 78 (2000)
99 Wash.App. 566
STATE of Washington, Appellant,
v.
Daniel William COYNE, Respondent.
State of Washington, Appellant,
v.
Clinton Joseph Burt, Respondent.
Nos. 17205-8-III, 17206-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Ten.
January 25, 2000.
Publication Ordered March 9, 2000.
John V. Jensen, Deputy Pros. Atty., Kennewick, WA, for appellant.
Nicholas W. Marchi, Carney & Marchi, Seattle, WA, Daniel William Coyne, Pullman, Pro Se. for respondent.
BROWN, J.
Daniel W. Coyne and Clinton J. Burt successfully sought suppression of drug evidence discovered following a consent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. NethWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. BeitoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.