Legal Opinion

In re Uber Technologies, Inc., Wage & Houremployment Practices Litigation (No. II)

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided May 30, 2017No. MDL No. 2784Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1377ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

Sarah S. Vance, Chair

Before the Panel: * Plaintiff in one action in the Southern District of Florida (Rojas) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Florida. This litigation currently consists of three actions pending in three districts, as listed on Schedule A. This litigation arises from the allegation that defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., and its subsidiaries1 (collectively, Uber), misclassify Uber transportation providers as independent contractors instead of employees and, thus, have not paid minimum wage, overtime…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Uber Technologies, Inc., Wage & Hour Employment PracticesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API