Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Savings Bank of Marengo v. Willenbrock

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1929No. 39273Published

1DissentKindig, J.

(dissenting). — I am sorry not to agree with my associates. It seems to me they are so fundamentally wrong that a dissent on this occasion is justifiable. Consequently, I hereby enter my protest against the majority opinion.

Appellee fixes the value of the old homestead, after deducting the incumbrances, at $1,640; while that of the new, after subtracting the liens, is $7,113. Assuming, without deciding, that appellee’s figures regarding the equities in the respective properties are correct, then it is found that such value of the old was $1,640, and that of the new, $7,113. Thus, subtracting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Benham v. Chamberlain & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  2. Voris v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Farmers Elevator & Livestock Co. v. SatreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Blue v. Louis Heilprin & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Paine v. MeansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API