Legal Opinion

People v. Baret

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2008PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

We hold that the courts below did not abuse their discretion in rejecting, without a hearing, the claim of defendant-appellant, Roman Baret, that his guilty plea was the result of threats made by his codefendant.

Baret and Reynardo Nunez were charged with sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell it. The People offered them a plea bargain under which Baret would plead guilty to one count of sale and Nunez to one count of attempted sale. Under the People’s proposal, Baret would get a 2 to 6 year sentence, and Nunez would get probation. The deal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. TinsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. BaretAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. PequeNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. BaretNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. GriffithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. BaretAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API