Legal Opinion

City of Waycross v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1931No. 20660PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. It is the duty of a municipal corporation to keep its streets and sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition; and if a defect has existed in a sidewalk for such a length of time that by reasonable diligence in the performance of their duties the defect ought to have been known by the proper authorities, notice will be presumed, and proof of actual knowledge will not be necessary in order to render the municipality liable for injuries occasioned thereby. Civil Code (1910), § 898; Idlett v. Atlanta, 123 Ga. 821 (51 S. E. 709) ; Scearce v. Gainesville, 33 Ga. App. 411 (126 S. E. 883). The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scearce v. Mayor of GainesyilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Idlett v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Enright v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. City of Rome v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Mayor of Macon v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Barnesville v. SappingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Brunswick Gas & Fuel Co. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Williams v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. City of Rome v. BrinkleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. City of Atlanta v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API