Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 2013No. 1D12-4703Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPadovano, J.

I agree that Hallberg v. State, 649 So.2d 1355 (Fla.1994), requires reversal of the denial of the motion to dismiss count six. As to the affirmance of the denial of the motions to dismiss counts two through five and seven through ten, I respectfully dissent and would certify a conflict with LaMorte v. State, 984 So.2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

As Judge Altenbernd reasoned in his dissent in LaMorte, section 775.15(12)(b), Florida Statutes does not define the phrase “misconduct in office.” We do not know whether the legislature meant to use the phrase in a broad sense to refer to any government…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. State v. ByarsSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Hallberg v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. LaMorte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API