Cunnington v. Scott
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the third district, and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Powers, J.:
This is an appeal from the third district from a judgment in favor of the intervenor. The plaintiffs filed their complaint, alleging that they were the owners, and entitled to the immediate possession, of a lot of ore, “being of the weight of almost five thousand pounds, marked ‘Harrington ore,’ shipped by one Harrington and others, or by said Harrington, from the Silvar Spar mine, in Tintic mining-district, Juab county, Utah territory, to said defendants,” valued at $482.95; that the ore was in the possession of, *447and wrongfully detained by, tbe defendants; tbat a demand was made…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Speyer v. Ihmels & Co.California Supreme Court · 1862
- Coburn v. SmartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Smith v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by3 opinions
- Portland Cattle Loan Co. v. GemmellIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Schilling v. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Bardwell v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1896