Legal Opinion

Cunnington v. Scott

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the third district, and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Powers, J.:

This is an appeal from the third district from a judgment in favor of the intervenor. The plaintiffs filed their complaint, alleging that they were the owners, and entitled to the immediate possession, of a lot of ore, “being of the weight of almost five thousand pounds, marked ‘Harrington ore,’ shipped by one Harrington and others, or by said Harrington, from the Silvar Spar mine, in Tintic mining-district, Juab county, Utah territory, to said defendants,” valued at $482.95; that the ore was in the possession of, *447and wrongfully detained by, tbe defendants; tbat a demand was made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Speyer v. Ihmels & Co.California Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Coburn v. SmartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Smith v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Portland Cattle Loan Co. v. GemmellIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Schilling v. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bardwell v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API