Legal Opinion

Bokum v. First Nat. Bank in Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1987No. 16574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Senior Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant Richard D. Bokum II (Bokum) appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant-appellee, First National Bank in Albuquerque (FNB). Bokum’s amended complaint, filed on April 9, 1985, contained seven counts: (1) “Usury,” in which Bokum alleged that a series of FNB loans were made at a higher rate of interest than allowed by law, and in which he asked the court for a forfeiture of $2,161,871.80 in usurious interest, plus $165,802.52 “affirmative recovery” as penalty for interest paid. The latter plea was based on a remedy for twice the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc. v. TerrelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Smith v. PRICE'S CREAMERIES, DIV., ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Haseltine v. Central Bank of SpringfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. First National Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennison v. MarloweNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. First National Bank v. Quinta Land & Cattle Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API