State v. Chinn

The defendant is a druggist and was convicted for selling intoxicating liquor in less quantities than four gallons, to James Stewart, without a prescription, in violation of the local option statute.

*612It appears that defendant is not only a druggist, but a physician as well. The only evidence worthy of consideration relates to two sales to Stewart, one on June 21, 1909, and the other a week thereafter, on June 28th, and it was npon these sales the case was tried in the circuit court. The accused admitted both these sales and relied in defense upon a prescription for-each. Two objections are…