Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Findlay Industries v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2009No. 2008-0700PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant, Findlay Industries, filed a complaint in mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, alleging that appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio had abused its discretion by failing to consider certain evidence that it had submitted in connection with Shirley Ruark’s application for permanent total disability compensation. Pursuant to Civ.R. 53 and Loc.R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, the matter was referred to a magistrate, who issued a decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law. The magistrate found that Findlay Industries’ evidence had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wajda v. M&J Automotive, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. KarabinosOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Capital One Bank USA, N.A. v. DeRisseOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. DiPenti v. Park Towers Condominium Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Sadlowski v. Boardman Local SchoolsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API