Ewing v. City of Helena
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Gtueein 'Smith, Chief Justice.
The controlling question is whether an occupation tax assessed by the City of Helena applies to appellant.
“'Contractors, brick or carpentry,” must pay $50 annually. Penalty for failure “shall be a fine twice the amount of the license imposed. ”
In Municipal Court appellant was fined $50. On appeal Circuit Court directed a verdict for $100. ■
Result here depends upon construction of the word “contractor.” It is undisputed that appellant (a brick mason) worked at $1.25 per hour. On one occasion he had been paid so much per thousand for laying brick. • In dealing with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jahn's Admr. v. Wm. H. McKnight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Brigman v. Holt & BowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Poor v. Madison River Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Little Rock, Hot Springs & Texas Railway Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Caldwell v. Atlantic B. & A. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davidson v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988