Legal Opinion

Cox v. Funk

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1979No. 7821SC705PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The sole assignment of error in this case is directed to the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Rule 56(c), North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. The crucial question in this case is whether the provision, “Subject to closing of house at 900 Hawthorne Rd. Sept 15, 1977” is a condition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Neuse Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Parrish Tire Co. v. MorefieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Price v. HornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Price v. HornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Mosely v. WAM, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Harris v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Carson v. GrassmannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. In re Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust executed by C and M Investments of High Point, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API