Legal Opinion

Jaime v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 17, 1971No. 1 CA-IC 483PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASE, Judge.

We are asked to review an award of the Commission arising from its finding that petitioner’s employer occupied the relationship of an independent contractor to respondent National Metals Company.* Petitioner’s employer had failed to provide workmen’s compensation insurance for their employees, and, as a consequence, petitioner instituted proceedings under the act in an attempt to collect compensation from National Metals.

The issue presented is :

WAS PETITIONER JESUS B. JAIME AN EMPLOYEE OF NATIONAL METALS COMPANY UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF A.R.S. § 23-902, SUBSEC. B ?

The facts are as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blasdell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Posey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Nochta v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Industrial Commission v. Farm & Home Food Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt Building Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Fund v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API