Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Luhrs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated November 19, 2001, which granted the petition and stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*358Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the subject insurance policy did not provide underinsured motorist coverage for the underlying accident. Further, because the noncoverage arose from a lack of inclusion, not a policy exclusion, a timely disclaimer of coverage was not required…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Worcester Insurance v. BettenhauserNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Handelsman v. Sea InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Markevics v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Sphere Drake Insurance v. Block 7206 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campos v. SarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. 474431 Associates v. AXA Global Risks US InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API