Legal Opinion

Beall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 30, 1917No. 8954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment for forgery; from Gordon superior court — Judge Tarver. May 31, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBeoyleS, P. J.

1. An indictment charging the forgery of a will should be drawn under section 231 of the Penal Code of 1910, and not under section 245.

(а) Such an indictment must allege that the forgery was done with intent to defraud the State or some person. Penal Code (1910), § 231. If the indictment does not contain such an averment, it is fatally defective and void, since it charges no offense under the law; and a verdict of guilty is a nullity, upon which no legal judgment can be founded; and after the defendant has been- convicted and sentenced he may move to arrest the judgment, notwithstanding he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Bank v. Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Herron v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Passley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Adams v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Adams v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API