Legal Opinion

People v. Guidry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1968No. Crim. 13282PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

J. — Defendant and codefendant, Samuel Wooten, were accused of possession of heroin in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11500. Defendant Guidry pled not guilty. Both defendants waived jury trial; both were found guilty; defendant Guidry’s prior convictions were found not true; a probation report was ordered; motion for new trial was made and denied. Criminal proceedings were adjourned and a petition was filed under Penal Code section 6451 in order that an examination and a hearing could be had on the question of addiction. Probation was denied and defendant was sentenced to state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. TalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. BarcenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. KurlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. MardianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Krauss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API