Legal Opinion
City of Manassa v. Ruff
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 21, 2010No. 09SC612PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
Both the appellant below-claimant Dale Ruff-and the appellees below -the City of Manassa and Pinnacol Assurance-petitioned for review of various aspects of the court of appeals' judgment in this workers' compensation action for disability benefits. See Ruff v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 218 P.3d 1109 (Colo.App.2009). The Industrial Claim Appeals Office had affirmed the refusal of an administrative law judge to disqualify an independent medical examiner due to an apparent or actual conflict of interest. The court of appeals remanded for reconsideration whether there was an appearance of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Munoz v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Whitelaw, III v. Denver City CouncilColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- ion Maternity v. BurrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- People in re T.TColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Baked, LLC v. GJG Property, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.