Legal Opinion

Stidham v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 6, 1996No. Nos. 96-CA-0992-WC, 96-CA-1249-WCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHRODER, Judge.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the Board) which affirmed an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision which found the .claimant did not incur an injury of appreciable proportions. The cross-petition alleges that the ALJ erred in finding the quail farm did not qualify for the agricultural exemption in coverage under the Workers’ Compensation Act.

The claimant, Beatrice Lynn Stidham, worked for the Bluegrass Quail and Chuck-ery Farm. On or about October 19, 1992, while bending over to pick up a bag of feed, she felt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. Crestfield Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  2. Michael v. CobosKentucky Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wendy Hanawalt v. J. Thomas Brown D/B/A Wild Rose Equestrian CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Wendy Hanawalt v. J. Thomas Brown D/B/A Wild Rose Equestrian CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API