Legal Opinion
Metcalf v. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 22, 1992No. 76387PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUNTER, Judge:
In May, 1990, Appellant wrote a letter to the Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision (Board), requesting Board approval to represent himself as Board Certified in Cosmetic Breast Surgery. Appellant claimed he was Board Certified by the American Society of Cosmetic Breast Surgery, but this board was not a member of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). Rule XXIII of the Board’s Policy, renumbered now as 435:10-7-2, defines who may lawfully claim to be “Board Certified”, “Diplómate” or “Fellow” 1. If not certified by the American Board of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Mothershed v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Hennessey v. Independent School District No. 4, Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. MohrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
- Davuluri v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & SupervisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Metcalf v. OKLA. BD. OF MEDICINECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992