Legal Opinion
181 Incorporated v. Salem Cty. Planning Bd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 30, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
140 N.J. Super. 247 (1976)
356 A.2d 34
181 INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, OAKFORD W. ACTON, JR., AND LAWRENCE W. POINT. PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE SALEM COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF SALEM, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 16, 1976.
Decided March 30, 1976.
Before Judges HALPERN, CRANE and MICHELS.
Mr. Norman Telsey argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Lawrence W. Point argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Acton & Point, attorneys).
2Per curiam
We affirm that portion of the summary judgment of the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Newark v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Reid Development Corp. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Hoglund v. City of SummitSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- 181 Incorporated v. Salem Cty. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- McQUEEN v. Town of West New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- County of Ocean v. Zekaria RealtyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Kode Harbor Dev. Assoc. v. AtlanticNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Nj Bldrs Ass'n v. Mayor and Township Committee of Bernards Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Tennis Club Assoc. v. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Hernando County v. Budget Inns of Fla., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.