Jett v. State

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the subsequent offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The jury assessed the punishment at eighteen months.

Appellant initially contends that the court erred in sustaining an objection made by the district attorney to the following statement made by appellant’s counsel to the prospective jurors during voir dire examination:

“Now, this does not mean the Grand Jury has necessarily heard any testimony whatsoever. They may or may not. They are not required to hear a single witness.”

As appellant states in his brief, “ . it…